Ashish Mishra @ Monu vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 362

RAJEEV SINGH
Ashish Mishra @ Monu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Brij Mohan Sahai, Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, Salil Kumar Srivastava.
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Shanshank Singh.

Table of Content
1. incident details and allegations (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. applicant's defense and contradictions in prosecution claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12)
3. investigation findings and witness accounts (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 19)
4. court observations on prosecution narrative (Para 22 , 23)
5. conclusion on bail application (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
6. regulatory observations on public assemblies (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Court convened through video conferencing.

2. Heard Shri Gopal Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Saumya Chaturvedi, Salil Kumar Srivastava and B.M. Sahai, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri V.K. Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Prachish Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Shashank Singh, learned counsel for the complainant.

3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in F.I.R. No. 219 of 2021, under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 307, 326, 427/34 I.P.C., Section 30 of ARMS ACT and Section 177 of M.V. Act, Police Station Tikuniya, District Lakhimpur Kheri with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

4. As per the prosecution case, the applicant, who was in his Thar Mahindra vehicle followed by tw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(All) 362

RAJEEV SINGHAshish Mishra @ Monu – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

RAJEEV SINGH
Ashish Mishra @ Monu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent