SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 362

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Ashish Mishra @ Monu – Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. – Opposite Party
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13762 of 2021
Decided On : 10-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Brij Mohan Sahai, Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, Salil Kumar Srivastava.
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Shanshank Singh.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 326, and 427; Arms Act, Section 30; Motor Vehicle Act, Section 177 - Bail application concerning F.I.R. No. 219 of 2021 related to a violent protest where the applicant allegedly directed his vehicle to crush protesters leading to fatalities - The court observed that despite the gravity of the allegations, the prosecution failed to establish firearm injuries among the deceased, emphasizing vehicular impact as the cause of death, supported by medical findings. (Paras 4, 24, 25)

(B) Bail - Evaluating the applicant's potential flight risk and influence on witnesses - Court concluded that existing conditions and prior cooperation with investigations warranted the granting of bail despite the serious charges. (Paras 26, 27)

Facts of the case:
The applicant and an armed group allegedly charged at peaceful protesters, resulting in the death of four farmers, while the applicant's subsequent claim implied that the incident was retaliation against violent protesters. The case revolves around the conflicting narratives of the incident, with no evidence linking the applicant directly to the violence alleged. (Paras 5, 8, 20)

Findings of Court:
Given the lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to the deaths through gunfire and the fact that the applicant's vehicle drove into the protesters, the court deemed the circumstances sufficient to grant bail under stringent conditions. (Paras 24, 26)

Issues: The primary issues included the credible evidence supporting the applicant's claims versus those of the prosecution, the nature of the charges involving fatalities without gunshot wounds, and responsibilities of law enforcement during large protests. (Paras 25, 27)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the absence of substantive evidence of gun injuries redirected the focus from accusations of intentional harm to the operational failure of the police to manage the protest, thereby leading to significant chaos and loss of life. (Paras 24, 28)

Result: The bail application was granted with specified conditions to ensure the applicant's presence in future proceedings. (Para 26)

Table of Content
1. incident details and allegations (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. applicant's defense and contradictions in prosecution claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12)
3. investigation findings and witness accounts (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 19)
4. court observations on prosecution narrative (Para 22 , 23)
5. conclusion on bail application (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
6. regulatory observations on public assemblies (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Court convened through video conferencing.

2. Heard Shri Gopal Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Saumya Chaturvedi, Salil Kumar Srivastava and B.M. Sahai, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri V.K. Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Prachish Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Shashank Singh, learned counsel for the complainant.

3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in F.I.R. No. 219 of 2021, under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 307, 326, 427/34 I.P.C., Section 30 of ARMS ACT and Section 177 of M.V. Act, Police Station Tikuniya, District Lakhimpur Kheri with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

4. As per the prosecution case, the applicant, who was in his Thar Mahindra vehicle followed by two other vehicles, came to the place of incident in high speed and killed the farmers by making indiscriminate firing.

5. On the written complaint of Jagjeet Singh s/o Hari Singh, the F.I.R. was lodged with the allegation that on 3rd October, 2021, farmers and labours of the local area were protesting peacefully at Agrasen Inter College Play Ground, Tikuniya, Kheri for showing the black flag to State Home Minister, Government of India, Mr. Ajay Mishra ‘Teny’ and Deputy Chief Minister Mr. Keshav Prasad Maurya, Government of U.P. It is further alleged in the F.I.R. that at about 3 p.m., applicant reached on the spot with 3-4 vehicle (four wheelers) along with 15-20 unknown persons armed with weapons. The applicant, who was sitting on the left side in the Thar Mahindra vehicle, started firing and the vehicle, which was moving ahead in high speed, crushed the crowd. Further allegation made in the F.I.R. is that due to fire arm injury, one Gurvinder Singh s/o Sukhvinder Singh died on the spot. Thereafter, the two vehicles including the vehicle of applicant overturned in the side ditch of the road, as a result, some pedestrians also received injuries. Thereafter, applicant run away from the spot by taking the cover of his firing. In the said incident, four farmers died, namely, Gurvinder Singh s/o Sukhvinder Singh r/o Motronia, Nanpara, Daljeet Singh s/o Hari Singh r/o Village Banjara Tanda, Nanpara, Nakshatra Singh s/o Sukkha Singh r/o Village Nandapurva Dhaurahara, Tehsil Khiri and Lavpreet Singh s/o Satnam Singh r/o Chaukhadafarm Palia Kalan, Kheri.

6. Shri Gopal Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has further been submitted that in the ancestral village of the applicant, i.e., Banveerpur, a wrestling competition was being organised since long back and in the same tradition, on 3rd October, 2021, a wrestling competition was scheduled with a public meeting, in which, Hon’ble Deputy Chief Minister Mr. Keshav Prasad Maurya was the Chief Guest. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the name of farmers, some leaders of opposition parties, in association with anti social elements, decided to protest the visit of the Chief Guest in village Banveerpur on the ground that in the past, father of the applicant, namely, Ajay Mishra ‘Teny’, who is holding the post of State Home Minister, Government of India made some statement on the protest of the farmers in relation to some Agricultural Laws. Shri Chaturvedi further submitted that as per the decided schedule, the helicopter of the Chief Guest was to be landed at Maharaja Agrasen Play Ground Helipad, Tikuniya and thereafter, he had to go to the place of wrestling competition by road. However, without any perm


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top