SUNITA AGARWAL, JAYANT BANERJI
Virendra Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri R.K. Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Anand Tewari, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation. Shri Pankaj Saxena appears on behalf of the respondent no. 7.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek for quashing of the order dated 09.01.2018 passed by the respondent No.4, Deputy General Manager, (LPG Sales), Indian Sub-Divisional Officer, Indian Oil Corporation, Bareilly, Area office, Bareilly.
3. Further prayers in the writ petition are as under:-
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to re-start the proper supply of LPG for the petitioner's firm."
4. Brief facts relevant to decide the controversy are that the petitioner No.1 namely Virendra Pal had applied and submitted application form for allotment of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak distributorship (RGG
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.