RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Mohd. Naseem Uddin – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. , Thru Secy. Vocational Edu. & Skill Development – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shailendra Kuamr Singh, C.S.C.-III assisted by Sri Shashank Bhasin, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to proceed in furtherance of the Charge-sheet dated 18.10.2019, issued by opposite party No. 1, contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.
(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith grant all consequential benefits such as release of salary, upon quashing of the Charge-sheet dated 18.10.2019, and completion of formalities towards settlement of the post-retiral dues of the petitioner."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the prayers made in the writ petition by submitting that the charge-sheet cannot be assailed before the writ Court and the petitioner should parti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.