PANKAJ BHATIA
Tufail Ahmad Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Instruction filed today, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned Standing counsel for the State.
3. The present writ petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner was employee with the respondent no. 3 on 15.6.2001 on a Class-IV post and is being paid wages at the rate of Rs.450/- per month since his initial engagement. It is also stated that despite the petitioner being entitled for being considered for regularization in terms of 2016 Rules, the case of the petitioner is not being considered.
4. Learned Standing Counsel was called upon to obtain instructions. He has produced instructions dated 01.10.2021 stating that in terms of the Government Order dated 09.01.1986, minimum wages were fixed at Rs.350/- per month. Subsequently, vide Government Order dated 01.07.1992, the wages of ''Kahar' were increased from Rs.400/- to Rs.500/- per month which is being paid to the petitioner. In respect of the claim of the petitioner for regularization, the instructions are that the petitioner had earlier also filed a representation raising the issues which was decided on 08.05.2015 whereby his request was rejected as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.