SIDDHARTH
Rakesh Kumar Arora – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Siddharth, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants, Rakesh Kumar Arora, Surajbhan Agarwal and Ankush Tyagi, in Case Crime No.1064 of 2020, under Sections-420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Vijay Nagar, District-Ghaziabad.
3. Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
4. The informant is also member of the Housing Society in dispute. The applicants are President and Secretary of the Housing Society. After resigning from the membership of the society, the informant has filed a civil suit for injunction restraining the office bearers of the society from selling the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.