JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Pathak, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1, 2 and Sri Mannu Chowdhary learned counsel for the respondent no.5 i.e. Gaon Sabha.

2. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the order proposed to be passed hereunder, this Court is proceeding to finally decide this matter at the admission stage, without putting notice to respondents.

3. Instant petition has been preferred challenging the impugned order dated 18.12.2020 (Annexure-5) passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation (respondent no.1) in Revision No.33 preferred by petitioner and also order dated 15.05.2019 (Annexuure No.3) passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation (respondent no.2) in Appeal No.26 preferred by Moti Lal (respondent no.3).

4. Facts give rise to this petition is that in provisional consolidation scheme petitioner has been preferred chak no.149 at two places. First chak was proposed on two plots i.e. plot no.253/2 min area 0.497 hectare and plot no.258/2 min area 0.332 hectare. Second chak was proposed over plot no.345 etc., total seven plots. As per case of the petitioner he was fully satisfied with the proposed