SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1631

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Rajeev Kumar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Chief Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Jayshanker Shukla
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.

Heard Sri Jay Shanker Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Jyoti Sikka, learned Addl. Advocate General, assisted by Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel-III for the State-respondents.

2. At the very outset, Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel-III has drawn attention of this Court towards the order dated 20.9.2021 passed by this Court in Service Single No.21036 of 2021, Avnesh Kumar Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, by submitting that the case of the present petitioner is identical with the case of Avnesh Kumar (supra) inasmuch as the place of posting of the present petitioner is unchanged in the same manner as the place of posting of Avnesh Kumar (supra) was unchanged, therefore, the present writ petition may be decided in terms of order dated 20.9.2021. For the convenience, the order dated 20.9.2021 passed in re; Avnesh Kumar (supra) is being reproduced herein below:-

    "1. Heard Sri Jay Shanker Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Jyoti Sikka, learned Additional Advocate General of U.P. for the State-respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 27

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top