SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1610

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Vinay Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. – 49354, 48444 of 2020
Decided on : 21-9-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satyendra Singh

Headnote:

Explosive Substances Act - Section ¾ - Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7 - Indian Evidence Act - Section 32(3) - Gangster - Bail applications - The raid conducted by police force was countered by gangster and member of his gang in a very planned way and 8 police personnels including Circle Officer of area were brutally killed and several police personnels sustained serious firearms injuries. The accused persons were carrying sophisticated firearms and accusation against accused-applicants is that they were in collusion with gangster and his associates. Under a conspiracy, they leaked information of police raid and gave them opportunity to remain in preparedness and did not render due support to police personnels nor informed police force regarding their preparedness to effectively counter raid and their being equipped with sophisticated firearms - Held, It is also evident that main accused persons had prior information of police raid and naturally, in present set of facts, this information was revealed by police which not only made main accused persons alert but also provided them fullest opportunity to prepare for attack and commit such a horrendous crime in which 8 police personnels including Circle Officer sustained gunshot injuries and died. Situation of crime was such and so sudden that police force could not get opportunity to sustain and counter and could do nothing. The accusation against accused-applicants is that they conspired with main accused for commission of offence because of their good relationship and loyalty with main accused and also they wanted to score their personal grudge with the Circle Officer. It is not possible to give a final opinion at this stage - Serious and heinous nature of offence, complicity of the accused-applicants in the conspiracy and taking into consideration overall circumstances of the case - Bail applications allowed.

JUDGMENT :

PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Since both the bail applications are connected and arisen from same case crime number, therefore, both the bail applications are being disposed off by a common order.

2. Heard Shri V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Satyendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant (Vinay Kumar Tiwari), Shri Shyam Narayan Verma, Shri Anurag Pathak and Shri Harshit Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant (K.K. Sharma) and Shri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Rajesh Mishra, Shri R.P. Pandey, Shri Kaushalesh Prasad Tiwari and Shri Mayank Mishra, learned AGA, Shri Abhijeet Mukherjee, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.

3. The present bail applications have been filed by the accused-applicants Vinay Kumar Tiwari and K.K. Sharma in Case Crime No. 0192 of 2020, under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504, 506, 353, 332, 333, 396, 412, 120B, 34 IPC, section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and section ¾ of Explosive Substances Act, P.S.-Chaubeypur, District – Kanpur Nagar.

4. In the year 1981, in Prem Chand (Paniwala) vs Union Of India, AIR 1981 SC 613, Justice V.R. KrishnaIyer opened the judgment with a question “Who will police the police?” About 40 years have passed, but, that question is still there with a bigger question mark. On the date of incident, the raid conducted by police force was countered by the gangster Vikas Dubey and member of his gang in a very planned way and 8 police personnels including Circle Officer of the area were brutally killed and several police personnels sustained serious firearms injuries. The accused persons were carrying sophisticated firearms and the accusation against the accused-applicants is that they were in collusion with the gangster and his associates. Under a conspiracy, they leaked information of police raid and gave them opportunity to remain in preparedness and did not render due support to police personnels nor informed the police force regarding their preparedness to effectively counter the raid and their being equipped with sophisticated firearms.

5. As per FIR version and police papers, the brief facts are that on 03.07.2020, at 1 AM in the midnight, the incident took place in respect of which on the same day in the early morning at 5:35 AM, the FIR was lodged in which 21 accused persons were named with 60 to 70 unnamed accused persons and the allegation was that an FIR was registered on 02.07.2020, Crime No. 191/20, under section 147, 148, 504, 323, 364, 342, 307 IPC and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 against Vikas Dubey, Sunil Kumar, Bal Govind, Shivam Dubey and Amar Dubey. In order to arrest the accused persons, with reference to GD No. 5 at 00:27 AM midnight, SO Vinay Kumar Tiwari with other SI and Constables keeping weapon and cartridges reached at Bela crossing, where, as planning CO Bilhaur Shri Devendra Kumar Mishra with other police officers along with Govt. Vehicle and Driver and SHO Bithoor, Shri Kaushalendra Pratap Singh with other police officers along with Government Vehicle and Driver and also SHO Shivrajpur, Shri Mahesh Yadav with SI and Constables (all mentioned in the FIR by name), after due consideration, set out from the place in search and arrest of the accused persons. Between the police parties of three police stations mentioned above, in view of fencing around the house of accused which is surrounded by big walls of adequate heights with barbed wire fencing and huge iron gates in different directions, it was decided that on reaching on the main gate in the leadership of CO Bilhour, the police will be divided into three teams. The first police team was led by CO Bilhour, the second by SHO Bithoor and the third by SO Chaubepur. The police teams and police officers ensured that there was no illegal article with them. Thereafter, the police party departed from Diwedi Atta Chakki to Bikru village and the moment they reached 20 meters close to the hous

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top