JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Shashi Kant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Sunil Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the informant - respondent no. 3 and Shri Rishi Chaddha, the learned A.G.A. for the State - respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs :

"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the First Information Report dated 16.06.2021 lodged by the Respondent No.3 against the petitioners in registered as Case Crime No. 0183 of 2021, under sections 366, 376-D, 323, 342 IPC and section 3(2)(v) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station - Utraon, District - Prayagraj.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding & directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in Case Crime No. 0183 of 2021, under sections 366, 376-D, 323, 342 IPC and section 3(2)(v) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station - Utraon, District - Prayagraj."

3. The impugned First Information Report No. 0183 of 2021 dated 16.06.2021, under sections 366, 376-D, 323, 342 IPC and section 3(2)(v) S.C./S.T. Act is reproduced below :

^^udy rgjhj fgUnh okfnuh lsok esa] Jheku Fkkuk/;{k mrjkao] iz;kxjktA

fo"k;&mek'kadj] jek'kadj iq=x.k jkedju ekS;Z o ,d vKkRk ds fo:) vigj.k] cykRdkj ekjihV] vuqlwfpr tkfr efgyk mRihM+u djus ds lEca/k es egksn; th] fuosnu gS fd eS dkty dqekjh mez 23 o"kZ iq=h LoŒ ekSthyky iklh xzke [kegfj;k lhdh Fkkuk mrjkao iz;kxjkt dh fuokfluh gwWA eS vuqlwfpr tkfr ¼iklh½ gwWA ?kVuk fnŒ Qjojh 2021 dks ?kj ls C;wVhikyZj tkrs le; fnu es yxHkx 11-30 ij esjk vigj.k mijksDr O;fDRk;ks }kjk dh fy;k x;k FkkA bu yksxksa us tcju esjs lkFk ekjihV dj ;kSu 'kks"k.k esjk fd;s FksA vkSj vKkr txg ij j[krs jgs gSA tks uSuh ds vkxs tkjh dkVh ds ikl gSA esjs HkkbZ us fnuakd 6-2-21 dks xqe'kqnh dh fjiksVZ rFkk ckn esa bu nksuks Hkkb;ksa dks Fkkuk mrjkao dks crk;k FkkA iqfyl ls cpus ds fy, bu yksxks us esjh 'kknh tcju mek'kadj ekS;Z ls vk;Z lekt efUnj uSuh esa djk;k FkkA vkSj ekjihV dj eq>s vius thtk ls ;g dgus dks etcwj fd, FksA fd jek'kadj dks ,oa mek'kdj ds lkFk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh tk;A esjh lxkbZ 10 fnlEcj 20 dks vius lekt ds yM+ds ls r; FkhA 24 ebZ 2021 dks 'kknh gksuh Fkh bu nfjUnksa us esjs lkFk vR;kpkj fd;k gSA eS fdlh rjg bu ds paxqy ls NwVdj vkbZ gwwWaA rc ls vius dks U;k; ikus rFkk bUgs dBksj naM fnykus ds fy, gj txg izkFkZuk i= ns pqdh gwWA vHkh rd buds fo:) ,QŒvkbZŒvkjŒ ugh gqvk gSA vkt fnukad 16-06-2021 dks efgyk izdks"B mŒizŒ y[kuÅ }kjk iqu% mrjko es izkFkZuk i= nsdj ,QŒvkbZŒvkjŒ ntZ djkdj mfpr /kkjkvksa es dk;Zokgh djus dh d`ik djsA lnSo vki dh vkHkkjh jgwWxhaA izkfFkZuh gLrk{kj dkty dqekjh¼dkty dqekjh½ eksŒ7080666578 fnukad 16-06-2021 uksV & eS dEi;wVj vkijsVj xzsM ¼,½ vuqjk/kk xqIrk izekf.kr djrk gwW fd udy rgjhj esjs }kjk dEI;wVj ij v{kj'k% vafdr dh x;h gSA^^

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 had married with the informant/victim/respondent no. 3 and had jointly filed Writ C No. 7852 of 2021 (Kajal Kumari & Another Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others), which was disposed of vide order dated 12.03.2021; wherein, the learned Single Judge has observed as under:-

"Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioners are at liberty to live together and no person shall be permitted to interfere in their peaceful living. In case any disturbance is caused in the peaceful living of the petitioners, the petitioners shall approach the Senior Superintendent of Police, Prayagraj i.e., respondent no.2, with a computerized copy of this order, who shall provide immediate protection to the petitioners."

5. Perusal of the impugned FIR, prima facie, discloses commission of cognizable offence by the petitioners.

6. Learned counsel for the informant/victim/respondent no. 3 has stated, before us, that on 23.06.2021, the statement of the victim has been recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has supported the First Information Report version.

7. Perusal of the impugned FIR, prima facie, indicates fraud practiced