JUDGMENT :

Prakash Padia, J.

1. Today the Advocates are abstaining from work. I have perused the record.

2. The petitioner has preferred the present Public Interest Litigation inter alia with the prayer to issue writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to remove the encroachment of the respondent No. 7 over Plot No. 139 of Gram Sabha Lockmanpur, Post Saiadarja, Block Berahani Tehsil Chandauli, District Chandauli.

3. The notices were accepted by the Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

4. It appears from perusal of the record that the petitioner is a member of Gram Sabha Lockmanpur, Post Saiadarja, Block Berahani Tehsil Chandauli, District Chandauli. It is stated in the PIL that Plot No. 139 is claimed to be a public pond but the respondent No. 7 namely Saroj Kumar Jais who is the Pradhan of the aforesaid village, has illegally encroached the aforesaid plot. When the petitioner came to know regarding the aforesaid fact, he made a complaint before the authorities on 17.10.2020 but till date no action has been taken, therefore, the petitioner is compelled to file the present PIL.

5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others, AIR 2011 SC 1132, held that the illegal encroachment on the Gram Panchayats' land by use of muscle power, money power and in collusion with the officials of the State and even with the help of the Gram Pradhan, such kind of blatant illegalities cannot be condoned. Even if the house has already been build on the land illegally, they must be ordered to remove their constructions. Further directions were given by the Apex Court in the aforesaid case to all the State Governments/Union Territories of the country that they should prepare scheme for eviction of illegal/unauthorized occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/Shamlatland and these must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/Union Territories in India were directed to do the needful, taking the help of other senior officers of the Governments. Paragraph 22 of the aforesaid judgment is quoted below:

"22. Before parting with this case we give directions to all the State Governments in the country that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorized occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/Shamlat land and these must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. For this purpose the Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/Union Territories in India are directed to do the needful, taking the help of other senior officers of the Governments. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupant, after giving him a show-cause notice and a brief hearing. Long duration of such illegal occupation or huge expenditure in making constructions thereon or political connections must not be treated as a justification for condoning this illegal act or for regularizing the illegal possession. Regularization should only be permitted in exceptional cases e.g. where lease has been granted under some Government notification to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, or where there is already a school, dispensary or other public utility on the land."

6. After the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh and others (supra), the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow has issued a circular dated 4th October, 2012. Para-1 of that circular simply refers to certain directions of this Court in a writ petition bearing number 6472 (M/B) of 2012 (Om Prakash Verma and others v. State of U.P. and others) and judgments of the Apex Court including that in the case of Jagpal Singh's case (supra), but Para-2 is relevant for the purpose. The same runs as hereunder:

7. I have noticed that large number of similar writ petitions are being filed o