DINESH KUMAR SINGH I
Akhlaq Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Abdul Mazeed, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri G. P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been moved for seeking bail in Case Crime No. 888 of 2019, under Sections 376-D, 506 & 341 of I.P.C. and Section 67A of I.T. Act, P.S. Bahedi, District Bareilly.
3. As per F.I.R., which was lodged by Jalil Ahmad, it has been stated that on 17.11.2019, at about 02:00PM, his daughter Seema aged about 17 years and niece Arshi aged about 14 years had gone to Nange Miya for the purpose of treatment. On the way, co-accused Wasim had lifted them away to a field of sugarcane where on the pistol point all the accused named in the F.I.R. had committed rape upon both victims and video clipping was also made and all the accused had threatened both victims that in case any complaint was made, video clipping would be made viral.
4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the accused applicant that accused applicant has been falsely implicated in this case due to some land dispute between father of the applicant and father of the victim. It is further argued that the radiological age of the vict
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.