JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Hans Raj Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail since 3.1.2015 in Case Crime No. 294 of 2014 u/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506, 452, 307, 308, 304 IPC, P.S. Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as he has not committed any offence as alleged.

3. Sri Mishra has filed questionnaire being issued from the learned trial court dated 22.4.2022, the same is taken on record.

4. At the very outset the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that since the present bail application being fourth bail application, therefore, he shall not advance any arguments or raise any ground which could have been taken at the time of rejection of first, second or third bail application. He has submitted that he shall argue the present bail application on a limited ground to the effect that the present applicant is in jail since 3.1.2015, about seven years and four months and despite the specific directions have been issued by