SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 488

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Chndra Prakash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Virendra Pratap Singh, Anurag Rai, Birendra Singh.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard Mr. Virendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Rabindra Kumar Singh learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Ajay Singh, learned Brief holder representing the State.

2. By means of this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 219 of 2021, under Sections 354, 376 IPC and Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, police station Bansgaon, district Gorakhpur seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. As per prosecution case, in brief, the complainant, who is mother of the victim lodged the first information report on 16.07.2021 at 17:07 hours with regard to an incident which took place on 16.07.2021 against the applicant Chandra Prakash Sharma for the alleged offence under Sections 354, 376 IPC and Sections 5/6 POCSO Act alleging inter-alia that today on 16.07.2021, her daughter aged about 8 years went beside her house to pluck guava from guava tree where the applicant was kissing her daughter by sitting her on his lap and thereafter raped her by took off her panty. She came home and told the entire incident to her and her mother-in-law. Thereafter, on the same day, i.e.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top