RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Ajay Kumar Pal – Appellant
Versus
State through C. B. I. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Vijay Kishor Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short C.B.I.) and Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the complainant/informant.
2. This Court has passed the order dated 26.04.2022 as under:
It has been contended that the present applicants are in jail since 7.4.2013 in Sessions Trial No. 830 of 2013, R.C. No. 1 (S)/2013/CBI/SC-1 New Delhi, under Sections 120 I.P.C. read with Section 302 I.P.C. and Section 25 (i)(b)(a)/26/27 Arms Act, Police Station CBI/SC-1 New Delhi.
It has been further contended that there are 81 prosecution witnesses, out of them identity of 11 material witnesses have not been disclosed. Therefore, those 11 witnesses have not been examined.
So far as the examination of other prosecution witnesses are concerned, till date 18 prosecution witnesses have been examined as per the informa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.