SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 531

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Awdhesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Hemlata Srivastava.
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for State-respondents.

2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 8.6.2022 being Case Crime No.197 of 2022 under Section 447 IPC & Section 3/5 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act 1984, P.S.-Kishani, Distt.-Mainpuri, and for a direction to respondents not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to aforesaid FIR.

3. The submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41A Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the judgement of this Court dated 28.01.2021 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 others vs. State of UP and 3 others) in which guidelines have been framed following the judgement of the Apex Court in different cases, relating to offences providing punishment of seven years or less.

4. The investigating agencies and their officers are duty bound to comply with the mandate of Section 41 and 41A of the Code and the directions i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top