SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
Dori Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail as the accused-applicant is apprehending his arrest during trial in connection with Session Trial No.488 of 2006 arising out of Case Crime No.5 of 2006, under Sections 307 and 506 IPC, Police Station Mandi Dhanaura, District Amroha.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is aged about 68 years and suffering from several disease. Initially the impugned FIR has been lodged against the applicant and three other co-accused persons but after investigation, the charge sheet has been submitted against co-accused persons, namely, Mukesh, Jaivir and Karan Singh. Further submission is that during trial, the PW-1 Samarpal has been examined before the trial court and on the basis of his statement, the applicant has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Being aggrieved, the applicant approached this Court by filing Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.21012 of 2007 and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.