JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Hari Nath Chaubey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Ray, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, Sri Mayank Awasthi, learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case no. 859 of 2020 (Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Amar Dayal Singh), under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Erstwhile Section 630 of Companies Act, 1956), Police Station-Pipri, District-Sonebhadra, pending before the Court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad

3. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be stated as alleged in the application are that:-

(i) The applicant was appointed as an employee of M/s. Hindalco Industries Limited (hereinafter called as “Company”), which is represented by Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Deputy Officer, who was duly authorized representative of the company.

(ii) The appointment letter was issued to the applicant on 24.11.1994 and he joined the services of company. Thereafter, the applicant was allotted company's quarter No.PB-318 by the company in its colony vide License of Quarter dated 11.09.2006 subject to certain condit