RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Manish Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ramesh Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. By means of present anticipatory bail application, the applicant has shown his apprehension of arrest in Case Crime No. 240 of 2021 u/s 147, 323, 354, 504, 506, 376 I.P.C., P.S, Shadiyabad, District Ghazipur.
3. The attention has been drawn towards the impugned F.I.R. wherein the present applicant is not named and no allegation of any kind whatsoever has been leveled against him. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that having ulterior motive and extraneous design in her mind the informant has deliberately and intentionally not named the present applicant in the F.I.R. as she has stated herself as wife of the present applicant. At the time of lodging of F.I.R. she has given impression that she is wife of the present applicant.
4. The present applicant is an Army personnel serving in Indian Army, presently posted at Line of Control, China Border. He has got married with one Priya Yadav as certificate of marriage to that effect has been enclosed with the application as Annexure no. 4.
5. The learned counsel has further submitted that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.