SANGEETA CHANDRA
Kedar Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record of the case.
2. None appears on behalf of B.S.A. although name of Mr. B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the B.S.A. has been shown in the cause list.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was working as Head Clerk in the Office of Sub Deputy Basic Education Officer, Azamgarh and retired on 31.3.2006 after attaining the age of 60 years. The petitioner had submitted his option to retire at the age of 60 years, therefore, he was covered under the Government Order dated 16.9.2009 which was issued accepting the recommendation of the Pay Commission revising the rates of pension/gratuity/family pension and commutation of pension in relation to teachers and employees of the Basic Education Board retiring on 01.01.2006 or thereafter. Paragraph 4(1) of the said government order provides that such teaching/non-teaching employees who retired before completing 10 years of qualifying service though not entitled to get pension like government servants, would be entitled to receive gratuity, if they retired on attaining the age of 60 years. Paragraph 4(4) of Government Order dated 16.09.2009 clarifies that teaching/non-t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.