SADHNA RANI (THAKUR)
Santosh Sahgal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SADHNA RANI (THAKUR), J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. He has filed the amendment application with affidavit. The same be kept on the record.
2. As per facts of the case, an F.I.R. was registered against the unknown persons that they were manufacturing fake pan masala and selling the same in half of the rate of the original, which is resulting into the loss of the State exchequer, hence an action be taken against them. During investigation, the police apprehended three persons one from outside the unit and the rest two from inside the unit manufacturing the said fake pan masala with various branded empty pouches and raw material manufacturing pan masala etc. The present accused is said to have apprehended from out side the manufacturing place, sitting in a car and from car also some incriminatory material is said to have been found. Vide order dated 27.10.2021 the coordinate bench of this Court enlarged the accused on bail in the same case under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and Section 63 of Copy Right Act, 1957. Later on, Sections 272 and 419 I.P.C. are also said to have been added. The trial court took cognizance against all the accused persons in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.