PANKAJ BHATIA
Vivekanand Dobriyal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
1. Heard Sri Siddhartha Sinha, learned Counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.N. Tilhari, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging the order dated 14.06.2022 issued in exercise of powers under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short "the Cr.P.C."). Although other prayers have been made in the application, however, the Counsel for the applicant confines his submission to the challenge to the order dated 14.06.2022 alone.
3. The facts in brief are that an FIR No.82 of 2022, under Sections 120B, 384, 389, 405, 420, 465, 471, 504 IPC read with Section 7/13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Station Kaiserbagh, District Lucknow was registered against the applicant. It is also on record that subsequently, Sections 467 and 468 IPC were added.
4. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on 09.05.2022, a non-bailable warrant was issued by the court concerned at the instance of the investigating authorities who had alleged that the applicant is not co-operating with the investigation. Subsequently,
Lavesh vs State (NCT of Delhi); 2012 Law Suit (SC) 562) [Equivalent Citation (2012) 8 SCC 730]
State through CBI vs Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar and others; (2000) 10 SCC 438
N. Nagendra Rao & Co vs State Of A.P.; (1994) 6 SCC 205
Dr. Partap Singh and another vs Director Of Enforcement; (1985) 3 SCC 72
Dr. Jai Shanker vs State of Himachal Pradesh; (1973) 3 SCC 83
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.