IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ.
M/S Awlesh Kumar Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Another - Respondent
WRIT TAX No. - 378 of 2022
Decided on : 05-05-2022
Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 143(2), 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Circular F.No. 225/40/2921/ITA-II dated 04.03.2021 - The court quashed the notice and reassessment order as the 'reason to believe' recorded by the assessing officer was unfounded and based on a 'change of opinion'. The court emphasized the need for a rational basis for the assessing authority to form the belief that income has escaped assessment and held that the reassessment cannot be made on a change of opinion.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, deriving income from civil contract work, filed a return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessing officer issued a notice under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, followed by a show cause notice. After scrutiny, the assessment order was passed, making an addition to the petitioner's total income. Subsequently, a notice under Section 148 was issued based on information from the Investigation Wing regarding cash deposits during the demonetization period.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the 'reason to believe' recorded by the assessing officer was unfounded and based on a 'change of opinion'. The reassessment proceedings were initiated on the same set of facts considered during the regular assessment, amounting to a 'change of opinion'. The court also noted that the reassessment order lacked a rational basis and was passed arbitrarily and unauthorisedly.
Issues: The main issue was whether the 'reason to believe' recorded by the assessing officer was valid and whether the reassessment proceedings were based on a 'change of opinion'.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for a rational basis for the assessing authority to form the belief that income has escaped assessment. It held that reassessment cannot be made on a change of opinion and that the 'reason to believe' must be based on tangible material with a direct nexus to the formation of the belief.
Final Decision: The court quashed the notice and reassessment order, ruling that they were without jurisdiction and an abuse of power.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Praveen Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:-
(i-a) Issue a suit writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 30/03.2022 (contained as Annexure No.8 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no. 3 under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act,1961 for the assessment year 2017-18"
Facts
3. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the petitioner derives income from civil contract work. For the Assessment Year 2017-18, the petitioner filed a return of income on 21.03.2018 along with audit report dated 02.11.2017. The case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1961") was issued on 13.08.2018 which was followed by notices under Section 142(1) of the Act, 1961. A show cause notice dated 07.12.2019 was also issued to the petitioner and the petitioner submitted entire details as required by the assessing officer.
4. Vide notice dated 23.11.2019 under Section 142(1) of the Act, 1961 issued during the course of regular assessment proceedings, the assessing officer required the petitioner to furnish reply on several points and also required him to furnish entire details of all the accounts maintained with the Bank/Post Office/Financial Institutions and the cash deposited by him in the Bank during the demonetization period. Every details with regard to cash deposit were also required to be furnished. The petitioner furnished the entire details which were examined by the assessing authority. After thorough scrutiny of the case, the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed on 25.12.2019 by the assessing officer, assessing the petitioner's total income at Rs. 44,74,620/-. He made an addition of Rs. 2,00,000/-.
5. Thereafter, notice dated 31.03.2021 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18 was issued by the assessing officer to the petitioner. The assessing officer recorded "reason to believe" as under:-
6. Aggrieved with the aforesaid notice for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition on 07.02.2022 which was subsequently amended. The reliefs sought in the present writ petition have been quoted above.
7. In paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit dated 25.04.2022, the respondent no.2 has stated as under:-
Delhi Cloth and General Mill s Co. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
Binani Industries Ltd. v. CCT,(2007) 15 SCC 435; A.L.A. Firm v. CIT
CIT v. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur
The Commissioner of Sales-Tax U.P. vs. M/s. Bhagwan Industries (P) Ltd., Lucknow
Sheo Nath Singh vs. Appellate Assistant CIT
Union Of India And Others vs. M/S. Rai Singh Dev Singh Bist & others
M/s. S. Ganga Saran and Sons (P) Ltd. Calcutta vs. ITO and others
Income Tax Officer, Ward No.62 vs. Tech Span India (P.) Ltd. and another
The 'reason to believe' for reassessment must be based on tangible material with a direct nexus to the formation of the belief, and reassessment cannot be made on a change of opinion.
Point of Law : Power to reopen an assessment must be conditioned on the existence of “tangible material” and that “reasons must have a live link with the formation of the belief”.
Under section 147 of the Act the proceedings for the reassessment can be initiated only if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any....
Mere change of opinion is not a ground for reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Point of Law : Court satisfied that there was prima facie material available on record before the assessing officer for issuing a notice for reassessment and the notice under Section 148.
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act requires tangible new material; mere change of opinion is insufficient.
The court emphasized the need for tangible material to believe that income had escaped assessment and held that the power to grant approval for re-opening an assessment is coupled with a duty and can....
A reassessment notice must be based on specific and valid information suggesting income has escaped assessment, and changing the basis for reassessment mid-proceeding is impermissible under the Incom....
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is invalid if based on materials already available during the original assessment, constituting a mere change of opinion without fresh evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.