DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Azeem – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
1. Since the First Information Report and the incident are the same in all the four aforesaid bail applications and, therefore, they are being heard and decided by a common order.
2. These four applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed seeking bail in Case Crime No.728 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 504 IPC, Section 7 Criminal law Amendment Act and Section 27 Arms Act, Police Station Bachhrawan, District Raebareli.
3. Facts of the case in brief are that the complainant, father of the deceased, lodged the First Information report on 20.11.2018 at 10.45 AM against accused-applicants and two other unknown persons. As per the allegations in the FIR, the complainant, his sons, Rinku Singh (deceased) and Ritesh Singh, his nephews, Mrityunjay Singh and Rananjay Singh and his cousin, Suresh Singh in the morning of the date of the incident i.e. 20.11.2018 went to Bhaureshwar Temple to have Darshan and Puja etc. After having Darshan in the Temple, when they came out of the Temple and were standing near the flower shop of Ram Chandra Goswami at around 7.45 AM, at that time, named accused, including the accused-applicants, and tw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.