RAMESH SINHA, SAROJ YADAV
Umesh Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAMESH SINHA, J.
1. The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been instituted by Umesh Dixit, whose brother Gyanendra Kumar alias Tinku was said to be murdered by the convict/respondent no. 6-Hari Shankar, with the following reliefs:
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties no. 1, 2 and 3 to re-arrest the opposite party no. 6 so that he serves out the life imprisonment imposed upon him by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. Court No. 3, Sitapur in Sessions Trial No. 78 of 2003, in the interest of justice.
(iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.
(iv) Allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the petitioner.
(A) Factual Background
2. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.