SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Suneet Kumar, J.
Dr. Om Prakash Gupta and Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko. and Anr. – Respondents
Writ -A No. - 8366 of 2017, 32882 of 2019
Decided On : 06-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Avinash Tiwari

The ACP scheme was compensatory and not based on the nature of duty, responsibility, or qualification of the government servant, and therefore, discrimination based on the practice of different streams of medicine was not justified.

Headnote:

Discrimination - Medical Officers - ACP Scheme - [Discrimination] - [Medical Officers] - [Government Order dated 14.11.2014, Government Order dated 04.05.2010, Government Order dated 05.11.2014] - The court discussed the discrimination faced by Medical Officers (Ayurvedic) in the implementation of the Special Assured Career Progression (SACP) Scheme as compared to Medical Officers of the Provincial Medical Health Services (PMHS). The court found that the classification was discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as the nature of duties performed by Medical Officers of different streams was comparable, and the ACP scheme was compensatory and not based on the nature of duty, responsibility, or qualification of the government servant. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the SACP scheme to be applicable to Medical Officers of other streams.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, confirmed Class-II Officers on the post of Medical Officers (Ayurvedic), filed a petition against the rejection of their representation for the benefit of the SACP Scheme, which was made admissible to the Medical Officers of the Provincial Medical Health Services (PMHS). The petitioners claimed discrimination based on their practice of conventional stream of medicine as against modern medicine.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the classification was discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as the nature of duties performed by Medical Officers of different streams was comparable, and the ACP scheme was compensatory and not based on the nature of duty, responsibility, or qualification of the government servant. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the SACP scheme to be applicable to Medical Officers of other streams.

Issues: The primary issue was the discrimination faced by Medical Officers (Ayurvedic) in the implementation of the SACP Scheme as compared to Medical Officers of the PMHS.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the classification was discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as the nature of duties performed by Medical Officers of different streams was comparable, and the ACP scheme was compensatory and not based on the nature of duty, responsibility, or qualification of the government servant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the SACP scheme to be applicable to Medical Officers of other streams.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Avinash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and perused the record with the assistance of the learned counsels for the parties.

2. Both the writ petitions are being heard and decided together on the consent of the parties.

3. The facts and questions of law arising in the writ petitions are identical.

4. The facts of Writ Petition No. 8366 of 2017 is being adverted to for the sake of convenience.

5. The petitioners are confirmed Class-II Officers on the post of Medical Officers (Ayurvedic); the first petitioner claims to be the President of Prantiya Ayurvedic Evam Unani Chikitsa Seva Sangh (for short ‘Association’) duly recognized by the second respondent, Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Education and Ayush (Ayush Anubhag-1), Civil Secretariat, Lucknow. Petitioners are working in the Pay-Scale at Rs. 15600-39100 and Grade Pay at Rs. 6600/-.

6. The instant petition is directed against the order dated 28.02.2017, passed by the first respondent, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, whereby, the representation of the first petitioner claiming the benefit of Dynamic/Special Assured Career Progression (for short ‘SACP’) Scheme made admissible to the Medical Officers of the Provincial Medical Health Services (for short ‘PMHS’), has been rejected. Further, a direction has been sought to grant the Medical Officers (Ayurvedic) the benefits of SACP w.e.f. the date it has been allowed to the Medical Officers of PMHS.

7. The facts, inter se parties, are not disputed.

8. The Medical Officers PMHS practice Allopathy stream of medicine. It appears that Medical Officers PMHS made a representation to the State Government for implementation of Dynamic ACP Scheme as made admissible to the Medical Officers under the Central Government. On considering their representation, the State Government vide order dated 14.11.2014, framed a scheme on the recommendation of the Committee. The SACP, primarily, provides that the Medical Officers PMHS would be entitled to upgradation of pay on completing 4, 11, 17 and 24 years of satisfactory service. The scheme was made applicable w.e.f. 01.12.2008. The relevant portion of the Government Order dated 14.11.2014, for the purposes of the instant writ petition, is extracted:

    **¼1½ Áknsf'kd fpfdRlk ,oa LokLF; lsok ¼ih0,e0,p0,l0½ ds fpfdRldksa ds fy, dsUnzh; fpfdRldksa ds leku Mh0,0lh0ih0 dh O;oLFkk ykxw djus dk vkSfpR; ugha gSA

¼2½ ih0,e0,p0,l0 laoxZ ds fy, ,0lh0ih0 dh fof'k"V O;oLFkk fu/kkZfjr dh tk;sA rnuqlkj ,0lh0ih0 dh fof'k"V O;oLFkk ds vUrxZr ih0,e0,p0,l0 laoxZ ds ÁFke Lrj ds in ¼osrueku :0 8000&13500@& led{k osrueku@ iqujhf{kr osru lajpuk esa lkn`'; osru cS.M&3 ,oa xzsM osru :0 5400@&½ ij fu;qfDr dh frfFk ls fuEu rkfydk ds LrEHk&2 esa mfYyf[kr lsokof/k ij mlds lEeq[k LrEHk&3 ds vuqlkj oS;fDrd osru cS.M ,oa xzsM osru vuqeU; djk;s tk;s%&

Ø0 la0

ih0,e0,p0,l0 laoxZ esa ÁFke Lrj ds in ij fu;qfDr dh frfFk ls lsokof/kA

,0lh0ih0 dh fof’k"V O;oLFkk ds vUrxZr oS;fDrd :i ls vuqeU; osru cS.M ,oa xzsM osruA

1

04 o"kZ dh fujUrj larks"ktud lsokA

osru cS.M&3 ,oa xzsM osru :0 6600@&

2

dqy 11 o"kZ dh fujUrj larks"ktud lsokA

Oksru cS.M&3 ,oa xzsM osru :0 7600@&

3

dqy 17 o"kZ dh fujUrj larks"ktud lsokA

osru cS.M&4 ,oa xzsM osru :0 8700@&

4

dqy 24 o"kZ dh fujUrj larks"ktud lsokA

osru cS.M&4 ,oa xzsM osru :0 8900@&

9. The petitioners herein belong to a different stream of medicine i.e. Ayurvedic and are entitled to the General ACP Scheme applicable to all other government servants which was conferred by the Government Order dated 04.05.2010, wherein, upon stagnation on a post the government servant is entitled to upgradation of pay at 10, 18 an

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top