CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Manorama – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue/C. C. A. of Revenue and Stamp Ald. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioner has purchased agricultural plot No.26 area 5 biswa 6 dhoor situated at village-fautapar, Tappa-Haveli, District-Basi through registered sale-deed executed on 23.03.1995 for Rs.47,200/- The stamp of Rs.15370/- has been paid on the value of Rs.1,06,000/-. Proceeding under Section 47-A of Indian Stamp was initiated in respect of petitioner's aforementioned sale deed which was registered as Stamp Case No.899/301/1994 under Section 47A Stamp Act State Vs. Manorama. A report was called for in the case accordingly Naib Tehsildar submitted his report dated 06.11.1995 before Collector in Stamp Case No.899/301/1994 mentioning that disputed sold plot is agricultural property and no building is situated in the disputed plot, the disputed plot is not of residential/commercial importance. The user of land has not been changed and there is no declaration under Section 143 of U.P.Z.A. & L. R. Act in respect of disputed plot No.26. Petitioner appeared in the aforementioned case after notice and Additional Collector heard the ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.