JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Anurag Khanna, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

2. Petitions are being decided by a common judgment and order as they arise from the same facts and incident on the consent of the parties.

3. Despite notice, counsel appearing for the fourth respondent has not filed counter affidavit, nor, has he put in appearance.

4. Petitioners in the bunch of petitions are the officials of the HDFC Bank Ltd., which include, Managing Director, Additional Managing Director, Company Secretary, Chief Finance Officer and the Branch Manager of the Branch. The complainant is the customer of HDFC bank, having a saving bank account.

5. For the sake of convenience, the facts setforth in the Writ Petition No. 9842 of 2020 (Piyush Prabhakar and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others) is being referred to.

6. HDFC bank is engaged in the business of banking and financial services, duly registered with the Reserve Bank of India, having its registered office at Mumbai (Maharashtra). The bank has various branch all over India, including, the branch at Agra. The complainant/respondent No