Roshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Prabhat Kumar assisted by Sri Vimal Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, Sri Aniruddha Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State, and perused the record.
2. Instant application has been filed by the applicant, assailing the order dated 30.6.2016 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1, District Balrampur in Criminal Revision No. 36 of 2015. He has further challenged the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.860 of 2014 pending before the Judicial Magistrate-I, District Balrampur.
3. Factual matrix of the case is that the respondent no.2 had filed an application under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. before the Judicial Magistrate-I, District Balrampur. The respondent no.2 levelled allegation therein that the applicant executed registered agreement to sale on 27th of September 2013 with respect to Gata No.465 having area 0.202 hectare and Gata No.628 having an area 0.142 hectare situated at Village Mathura, Police Stateion Lalia, District Balrampur. The respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.