RAJESH BINDAL, VIVEK VARMA
Sachin Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Varma, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This intra Court appeal arises from the judgment and order of learned Single Judge dated December 8, 2021 passed in Service Single No. 14021 of 2018 (Sachin Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary and Another) connected with two other petitions. The operative portion of the order of the learned Single Judge is reproduced hereunder:
10. Operative portion of the judgment dated 9.5.2017, has already been extracted hereinabove. From perusal of the judgment and order dated 9.5.2017, it is evident that this Court directed for holding a fresh enquiry into the allegations of malpractices in the examination and this Court also upheld the decision of the State Government to hold a fresh selection by appointing a new Agency. If the petitioners had any grievance against the said judgment, they should have challenged the said judgment or file a review.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.