ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD
Deepak Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioner is an individual who is engaged in the business of trading of Arecanut (Supari), Chopped Betal Nut and Sweet Betal Nut in the name of his proprietary concern namely “S.K.L. Enterprises”. He alleges that his Books of Account and other records are subject to audit under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1961’). He further claims to be filing his return year after year and has been assessed to tax accordingly. For the Assessment Year 2019-20, the petitioner filed his return under Section 139(1) of the Act on 26.08.2019 disclosing total income of Rs. 6,81,630/-. The turnover during the year from his proprietary concern aggregated to Rs. 5,87,26,116/-and aggregate purchases are of Rs. 5,81,61,860/-. He further asserts that he has been assessed under Section 143(1) of the Act on the basis of return submitted by him on 26.08.2019 and no notice has been issued to him under Section 143(2) of the Act.
2. It transpires that the jurisdictional authority i.e. respondent no. 2 issued a notice to petitioner dated 16.03.2023
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.