SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1719

K. J. THAKER, AJIT SINGH
Jagdish Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Nazimulla – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nigamendra Shukla, Anju Shukla
For the Respondent: Pawan Kr Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Nigamendra Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for respondent-Insurance Company and perused the judgment and order impugned.

2. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants who are the parents of the deceased, challenges the judgment and award dated 22.4.2010 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.4, Ghaziabad (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in MACP No.492 of 2006 awarding a sum of Rs.3,92,000/-with interest at the rate of 6% in favour of the claimants for the death of Deepak Sharma.

3. Parents of the deceased were ordered to be paid 1,92,000/-with 6% rate of interest out of the said award. As far as the widow is concerned, she has felt happy with the amount ordered to be paid to her by the Tribunal and, therefore, she has not come up before this Court.

4. The accident is not in dispute. The issue of negligence decided by the Tribunal is not in dispute. The Insurance Company has not challenged the liability imposed on them. The only issue to be decided is, the quantum of c

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top