JUDGMENT :

(Neeraj Tiwari, J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Savitra Vardhan Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:

I. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of certiorary commanding the opposite parties to quashing the Impugned rejection order dated 30.08.2014 and appellate order dated 13.05.2015 except decision with regard to amount of provident fund.

II. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to treat the petitioner as retire from service subsequently to pay the retiral dues namely as pension, amount of gratuity, amount of leave encashment, amount of group insurance, arrear of pension and other dues.

III. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the interest towards the release of amount of provident fund and to pay the arrear of salary for the period of suspension.

3. Since, pleadings have been exchanged between the parties, therefore, with the consent of the parties, the petition is being decided at the admission stage itself.

4. Brief facts of the case are that