JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Kundan Rai, learned counsel for revisionists and Sri Paritosh Malviya, learned AGA for the State.

2. The facts of the present case reveals that revisionists herein had earlier faced trial being Sessions Trial No. 133 of 2005 for offences under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, wherein by judgment and order dated 07.12.2006, they were granted acquittal.

3. Subsequently, the revisionists and four other accused persons faced another trial wherein by the impugned judgment and order dated 21.12.2013 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra in Complaint Case No. 2164 of 2013 (Pratap Singh vs. Satish and others) they were convicted under Section 406 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and were sentenced imprisonment for two years' each along with fine of Rs. 5000/-under Section 406 IPC as well as one year each along with fine of Rs. 500/-under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in default each has to undergo two months' additional imprisonment. Further they were directed to deposit Rs. 25,000/-as compensation under Section 357 Cr.P.C. The appeal thereof was partly allowed whereby only the present revisionists were convicted and rest of four accused