JUDGMENT :

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Devendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Complaint Case No.03 of 2016, under Section 18(A)(i), 27,28,16,17(C),17(B)(C), 27(B) (ii),27(C),27(D), 18A, 18B, 28A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, P.S. Inchauli, District Meerut, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have supplied mis-branded and substandard drugs to the co-accused persons and the owner and proprietors of several medical stores.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that on the basis of statement of co-accused person the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant was neither arrested nor any drugs was recovered from him. The applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in complaint case. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant hav