ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Hublal – Appellant
Versus
Kalloo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Despite the service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the respondents.
3. Present appeal has been filed against the judgement and decree dated 13.10.1992 passed by the Court of 11th Additional District Judge, Lucknow, in Civil Appeal No.22/92, Sri Ram Versus Hublal and another allowing the appeal of the defendant/respondent no.2 and dismissing the suit for specific performance of a contract of the plaintiff/appellant vide regular suit no.284/88 Hub Lal Versus Kalloo and another dated 24.12.92 by the Court of Munsif Hawali, Lucknow on the following amongst others.
4. This second appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law:
5. The crux of the matter is that a registered agreement to sell was executed by respondent no.1 in favour of the appellant on 22.07.1986 regarding two biswa land in Khasra No.671, Village-Dehwa, Post-Moha
R.C. Chandiok And Another Vs. Chuni Lal Sabharwal and Others reported in 1970 (3) SCC 140
Rathnavathi And Another Vs. Kavita Ganashamdas reported in (2015) 5 SCC 223
Union of India & Others Vs. Indian Charge Chrome & Another reported in (1999) 7 SCC 314
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. C. Padma & Another reported in 2003 (7) SCC 713
Yadlapati Vs. Venkateswarlu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Another reported in 1992 Supp1 SCC 74
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.