ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Ramavtar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Shri Avanees Kumar Rai under the authority of Samarth Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Abhishek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
2. Considering the nature of the order that is proposed to be passed, the service of notice upon private respondent Nos. 3 to 12 is being dispensed with.
3. The writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 24 (4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and is directed against the order dated 30.11.2023 passed in appeal No. 257 of 2022 by the Commissioner (Administration) Varanasi Division, Varanasi in exercise of powers under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 whereby and whereunder the appeal has been dismissed upholding the order dated 4.2.2022 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Chakiya, District Chandauli under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006.
4. Shri Abhishek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel at the very out set submits that the order impugned passed by the learned Commissioner in appeal under Section 24 (4) of the Uttar Pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.