JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Manish Kumar, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri Vijay Bahadur Verma, learned counsel for the private respondents.

2. Present petition has been preferred for quashing of the impugned order dated 16.01.1981 passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) and the impugned revisional order dated 09.07.1981 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the Basic year Khatauni, the land of Khata No. 875 having several gatas were recorded in the name of Chillar, the predecessors in interest of the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the Sheo Nandan alias Nannan had three sons namely, Chillar, Manju and Hansraj. Chillar had one son namely Pheru. Pheru had six sons namely Chitbahal, Ram Bahal, Munnu, Hannu, Dhannu and Nanhu whereas Chit Bahal had one son namely Raj Deo. All these persons are petitioners in the present petition. Manju had one son namely Mathura and Mathura had one son namely Ram Daur, who is the respondent in the present petition. Hans Raj had one son namely Bal