SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1935 Supreme(All) 442

HARRIES
Jaddu Ahir – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Harries, J. - The appellant Jaddu was charged before the learned Sessions Judge of the Benares District with an offence u/s 302, Penal Code. He was convicted of an offence under that section and sentenced to death. The appellant Ghurbari was charged with abetment of the offence committed by the appellant Jaddu and he was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to transportation for life. Against these convictions and sentences each appellant has preferred an appeal to this Court and the record has also been forwarded to this Court for confirmation of the death sentence passed on the appellant Jaddu.

2. The charge against Jaddu was that he together with one Kishun, who became an approver in the case, murdered one Zahur Khan at about a ghari before sunset on 7th April 1934, on the bank of the Ganges near the village Bargawan. The charge against Ghurbari was that he instigated and abetted the crime and that he was actually near the scene of crime when it was actually committed.

3. The case against Jaddu was that he was guilty of premeditated and brutal murder and against Ghurbari it was alleged that he had actually planned it and had used his influence to get Jaddu and Kishun to c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top