SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 507

PATHAK
BHAU RAM JAWAHARMAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PATHAK J. - The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions u/s 66(1), Income Tax Act, 1922 :

"1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the gifts of Rs. 10,000 made by Ganpati Devi to Sita Devi on May 12, 1960, of Rs. 10,000 made by Murari Lal to Saroj Kumari on March 23, 1960, and Rs. 10,000 made by Brijmohan to Smt. Pushpa Devi on September 21, 1960, were valid in law ?

2. If the answer to the aforesaid question is in the affirmative, whether the Tribunal was legally right in confirming the disallowance of interest on the same ?"

For the purposes of appreciating the facts in this case, it appears convenient to set out the following family tree :

 

Brijmohan (wife, Ganpati Devi)

 
 

 

Murari Lal (wife, Sita Devi)

Prabhat Kuma (wife, Pushpa Devi)

Saroj Kumari (minor dauther)

Brijmohan and his sons, Murari Lal and Prabhat Kumar, constitute a partnership firm, Messrs. Bhau Ram Jawahar Mal, the assessee before us, On March 23, 1960, Murari Lal purported to make a gift of Rs. 10,000 to his sister, Saroj Kumari. On May 12, 1960, Ganpati Devi purported to make a gift of Rs. 10,000 to her daughter-in-law, Sita Devi. On September 21, 1960, Brijmohan pur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top