JUDGMENT

Sulaiman and Kanhaiya Lal, JJ. - This is a plaintiff's appeal under the Letters Patent from a decree of a learned Judge of this Court setting aside the decree of the lower appellate court and dismissing the suit in toto.

2. The plaintiff's allegations were that the plots in suit were the tenancies of one Ghisa deceased. The plaintiff alleged himself to be an heir of Ghisa and as having been in joint cultivation with him over these plots. It was stated that on the 4th of February, 1919, the lambardar had recognized the plaintiff as the tenant of these plots and had indeed attested this fact before the kanungo; that the plaintiff was in possession of these fields by cultivation in the year 1326 Fash, that in kharif 1327 Fasli he actually sowed some crops, but that in March, 1920, the defendants wrongfully dispossessed the plaintiff by cutting the standing crops. It is necessary to enumerate the reliefs which were claimed by the plaintiff in his plaint. They are as follows:

(1) Rs. 100 as the value of the crops illegally cut by the defendants.

(2) Ejectment of the defendants and a decree for possession in favour of the plaintiff.

(3) A perpetual injunction restraining the defendan