BRODHURST, DUTHOIT, MAHMOOD, OLDFIELD, W. COMER PETHERAM
Kandhiya Lal – Appellant
Versus
Chandra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Oldfield, J. - The answer to this reference seems to me afforded by the terms of Act XXVII of 1860. By that Act "no debtor of any person shall be compelled in any Court to pay his debt to any person claiming to be entitled to the effects of any deceased person, or any part thereof, except on production of a certificate, to be obtained in the manner hereinafter mentioned, or a probate or letters of administration, unless the Court shall be of opinion that payment of the debt is withheld from fraudulent or vexatious motives, and not from any reasonable doubt as to the party entitled."
2. The Act indicates the course to be taken by the heirs, and the debts should be collected by the administrator, and the assets distributed amongst the heirs.
3. The Court can permit an action to be brought by the heirs under the discretion allowed, but it can only properly do so when the party or parties suing are in a position to sue for the whole debt, for to permit one heir to realize his share would be to alter the nature of the contract, and to subject the debtor to inconveniences and hardships.
4. I would answer the reference in the negative.
Petheram, C.J. and Brodhurst, J.
5. concurred.
Duth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.