SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 1409

N. N. MITHAL
Shakoor – Appellant
Versus
Palakdhari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.P. Singh, for the Appellant; S.D. Pathak, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

N.N. Mithal, J. - This is a second appeal by the Defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the Court below in a suit for specific performance of contract of sale.

2. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants, first set, were residents of village Gauna Tappa Kenwali Pargana Haveli district Gorakhpur where they bad their residential house and also cultivatory land. The Defendants first set also owned some bhumidhari land in village Shyam Dewrwa including plot No. 370. The entire bhumidhari land of this village was transferred by them to the Plaintiffs through two sale deeds except plot No. 370 because in the revenue records its khasra number had been wrongly mentioned as plot No. 317 which required to be corrected. According to the Plaintiffs in March, 1968 the parties negotiated the sale of this plot also in fovour of the Plaintiffs and it was agreed that the Defendants first set will first get the number of the plots corrected in the revenue records within six months and thereafter execute a sale deed in favour of the Plaintiffs. The earnest money was received by the Defendants first set on 8th March, 1968 when an agreement of sale was also executed. It is also a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top