H. N. AGARWAL
Genda Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ramadhar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.N. Agrawal, Member. - This is a reference made by Sri. S.M. Ibrahim, Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi, recommending that the revision against the order dated January 29, 1973 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jalaun in suit No. 106 under Section 176, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, may be dismissed.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and have gone through the record. The opposite parties have been represented through a counsel, but neither they nor their counsel appeared on the date the arguments were heard.
3. The facts may be briefly stated Ramadhar and Ram Gopal and filed a suit under Section 176, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act against Genda Lal. The plaint bore the signature of Ram Gopal and the alleged thumb-impressions of Ramadhar. The defendant, Genda Lal moved an application before the trial court to the effect that plaintiff No. 1. Ramadhar was blind and that his thumb-impressions on the plaint as well as the Vakalatnama were forged and should be investigated by an expert. He prayed that the specimen thumb-impression of Ramadhar alongwith the thumb-impressions on the plaint and the Vakalatnama may be sent to the expert Ramadhar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.