H. N. AGARWAL
Basdeo – Appellant
Versus
Munna – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.N. Agarwal, M. - This is a revision against the order dated June 11, 1971 passed by Sri S.M. Hasan, Addl. Commissioner, Faizabad Division in Appeal No. 590 in a suit under Section 176, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and have gone through the record. The opposite parties have not appeared to contest the revision in spite of due notice.
3. The learned Additional Commissioner has passed a one line order as follows : 'Heard. Application has not force. Rejected.' This order was passed on the application of the revisionist Srimati Basdei, daughter of Maya Ram to the effect that she should be impleaded as a necessary party in the appeal pending before the Additional Commissioner arising out of the suit Sunder v. Munna and others under Section 176, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act as she herself was the daughter of Maya Ram, a co-tenure-holder in the land. The learned counsel for the revisionist has contended that the suit was one for partition and all person interested in the property were necessary parties, and the learned Additional Commissioner has acted illegally and with material irregularity in not allowing the application. The learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.