SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 900

H. N. AGARWAL
Basdeo – Appellant
Versus
Munna – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.N. Agarwal, M. - This is a revision against the order dated June 11, 1971 passed by Sri S.M. Hasan, Addl. Commissioner, Faizabad Division in Appeal No. 590 in a suit under Section 176, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and have gone through the record. The opposite parties have not appeared to contest the revision in spite of due notice.

3. The learned Additional Commissioner has passed a one line order as follows : 'Heard. Application has not force. Rejected.' This order was passed on the application of the revisionist Srimati Basdei, daughter of Maya Ram to the effect that she should be impleaded as a necessary party in the appeal pending before the Additional Commissioner arising out of the suit Sunder v. Munna and others under Section 176, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act as she herself was the daughter of Maya Ram, a co-tenure-holder in the land. The learned counsel for the revisionist has contended that the suit was one for partition and all person interested in the property were necessary parties, and the learned Additional Commissioner has acted illegally and with material irregularity in not allowing the application. The learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top