SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(UK) 312

IRSHAD HUSSAIN
CHURHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Sandhu, VINOD SHARMA

IRSHAD HUSSAIN. J.


( 1 ) THE appellants have been convicted and sentenced to undergo R. I. for one year under Section 147, I. P. C. and R. I. for ten years, each under Section 304, I. P. C. read with Section 149, I. P. C. , per judgment dated 19. 8. 1983 passed, by the then Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun in Sessions Trial No. 35 of 1982.

( 2 ) THE appellants Churha and Kesho Ram are since deceased, there-fore, the appeals in regard to these two stand abated under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case as emerged from the F. I. R. and the evidence were that Karam Singh took Dakhii-Rehan (possessory-mortgage) of agricultural land having an area of three Bighas situated in his village Dhakrani, P. S. Vikash Nagar, District Dehradun, from Tulsi, the father of appellant Nanhe, about twelve years ago (from the date of the occurrence ). This land was subject matter of litigation between Karam Singh and appellant Nanhe but according to the prosecution Karam Singh remained in actual physical possession of the same. On 27. 10. 1981 at about 1 p. m. all the appellants trespassed into the land while Karam Singh was ploughing it. A state o






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top