SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(UK) 91

RAJESH TANDON
BACHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Gupta, Rajendra Dobhal

RAJESH TANDON, J.

( 1 ) SRI Rajendra Dobhal, for the revisionist and Sri N. C. Gupta, Standing counsel for the respondent.

( 2 ) THIS revision arises out of the order passed by the District Judge, Uttarkashi dated 22-4-1986 passed in Original Suit No. 9-of 1985, Bachan Lal v. State of U. R

( 3 ) THE brief facts giving rise to this revision are that a suit was filed by Sri Bachan lal Thalwan in the Court of District Judge, uttarkashi praying for the following reliefs : (A) A decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession, occupation and enjoyment of two muthi land granted to him forming part of plot No. 2112 in village Barahat, District Uttarkashi by the Deputy commissioner In charge, Uttarkashi. (B) Costs of the suit, and any other relief which the learned court may deem fit in the interest of justice or to which the plaintiff is found entitled. According to the plaint averment the plaintiff applied for two muthi of land out of plot No. 2112 of village Barahat, District uttarkashi in the month of November, 1974. under Government Grants Act, for construction of house for residential purpose. The land according to the plaintiff lies withi






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top