SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(UK) 47

IRSHAD HUSSAIN
BALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S.Verma, Lok Pal Singh

IRSHAD HUSSAIN, J.


( 1 ) THE present criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the code of Criminal (hereinafter for short 'code') has been filed for quashing the criminal proceedings in criminal case No. 56 of 2001 after setting aside the summoning order dated 16-11-2001 passed by I Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardwar and also judgment and order dated 29-4-2002 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hardwar in criminal revision No. 20 of 2002.

( 2 ) HEARD Sri K. S. Verma, learned counsel for applicants and Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and learned A. G. A. for State.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 2 complainant filed an application under Section 156 (3) of the code before the learned Magistrate alleging that on 23-8-2001 at about 11 a. m. , eight accused named therein and who are the petitioners in the present petition trespassed into his agricultural plot and assaulted him. Out of these eight, one Suresh Kumar gave a knife blow and another named as Rajbeer fired a shot from pistol which fortunately did not hit the said victim. As a result of the assault he sustained injuries. The report of the incident was not lodged by the police and a registere












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top