SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(UK) 191

V.S.SIRPURKAR, IRSHAD HUSSAIN
SURENDRA SINGH ALIAS BABLOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Singh

V. B. SERPURKAR, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment shall dispose of the Criminal Appeal no. 58 of 2004 along with Criminal reference No. 3 of 2004 and also the Criminal appeal No. 56 of 2004. Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2004 has been filed by the accused-smt. Naresho agamst the conviction under s. 120-B, I. P. C. and the resultant sentence for life imprisonment. Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 2004 has been filed by the accused-surendra Singh, who is also convicted for the same offence under S. 302, I. P. C. , but has been awarded death sentence. A reference is made only for confirmation of the death sentence awarded by the Sessions judge. Needless to mention that both the accused-appellants were tried in a common sessions trial, where one Shiv Kumar alias shibbu was said to have been murdered in the night of 23/24th February, 1993. While accused-Surendra Singh, who was accused no. 1 in the trial, was charged with a sub-stantive offence, the accused-Naresho, who was accused No. 2 in the trial, was roped-in in the aid of S. 120-B, I. P. C. In this judgment, the accused persons shall be referred either by their names or by their original accused number during the trial.

( 2 ) THE deceased-Shiv Kumar


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top