SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(UK) 113

C.S.RAWAT, RAJESH TANDON
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. , HARIDWAR – Appellant
Versus
KUSUMLATA (SMT. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Tanveer Alam Khan

RAJESH TANDON, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Tanveer Alam Khan, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri R. P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and award dated October 13, 2004, passed by workmen's Compensation Commissioner, chamoli in W. C. C. No. 9 of 2002/2003. Smt. Sudesh Kaur v. New India Assurance company Limited and another.

( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated, Smt. Kusumlata, wife of Basudev Singh, R/o Village Jhirkoti, patwari Circle-Gauchar, tehsilkaranaprayag, district Chamoli filed an application on July 4, 2003, for grant of compensation with the allegations that on december 23, 2002 at about 6-7 p. m. accident had taken place of the jeep, which was being driven by Basudev Singh due to which Basudev Singh died on the spot. At the time of accident, he was aged about 27 years and was getting a salary of Rs. 3,000 per month and a sum of Rs. 50 per day for fooding and lodging. The claimant has claimed a sum of Rs. 8,30,000 as compensation.

( 4 ) THE written statement was filed on behalf of the New India Assurance Company denying averments made in the petition and it was stated that the deceased Basudev Singh was the owner of the Jeep No. U





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top