SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(UK) 295

J.C.S.RAWAT
NASIR AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Sandhu, Rajeev Mohan, Zafar Siddique

( 1 ) THIS is a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 30-6-1984 passed by Sri V. S. Bajpai, the then addl. Sessions Judge (Special Judge), nainital in S. T. No. 173/1983, State v. Nazir ahmad and Ishrat Ali, whereby the appellant no. 1-Nasir Ahmad and appellant No. 2-Ishrat ali were convicted and sentenced to undergo R. I. for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 under Section 324, ipc and 324/34, IPC respectively. In default of payment of fine, the appellants would further undergo R. I. for a period of six months.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case in a nutshell is that on 4-4-1982 at about 1 p. m. the injured-Om Prakash was going on a cycle from his shop to his house. When he reached near the Masjid in Mohalla Bansphoran, the front wheel of his cycle dashed the foot of the appellant-Nasir Ahmad. The appellant-Nasir Ahmad then pulled the complainant down from the cycle and started hurling abuses to him. The appellant-Ishrat Ali caught hold of the hands of the injured from back and the appellant-Nasir Ahmad gave him a knife blow near the chest, due to which the complainant fell down on the ground and became unconscious. Rajendra, Ramesh chandra and Babli had al






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top